Environmental
Residents’ Comments About Existing Fire Hazards Do Not Constitute Substantial Evidence of a New Project’s Impacts Under CEQAProperly Posting Notice of Determination Triggers Short CEQA Statute of Limitations Despite Not Providing the Notice to Petitioner as RequestedAgency Email Correspondence Must be Retained Under CEQA, Appeals Court Holds
Real Estate & Construction
Appellate Court Holds Oakland Could Collect Impact Fees Notwithstanding A Prior Agreement With A Developer Detailing What Fees Would Apply To The Development ProjectFirst District Holds Neighbor is Not Eligible for Anti-SLAAP Relief Because His Conduct, Though Central to the Dispute, Did Not Form Basis For Writ of Mandate PetitionEIR For Fuel Reduction Plan Allowing For Future Adaptive Management Strategies To Be Finalized In the Field Contained Sufficient Project Description and Level of Detail, Court Holds