San Francisco Employment Law Firm Blog

Blog Authors

Latest from San Francisco Employment Law Firm Blog

religious accommodation at workplace in California
Workers in California often assume that because religious beliefs are private, they never have to explain anything about their religion when requesting a workplace accommodation. While it’s true that employers cannot demand intrusive details, many employees make the opposite mistake: they refuse to provide even the basic information needed for the employer to evaluate their request.
Under both Title VII

Some of the most common legal mistakes that California tech startups and other small employers make with their employees are also the easiest to avoid:

  • Terminating an employee without consulting an attorney about the circumstances of that termination. Just because you believe that you have valid reasons for terminating an employee, who also happened to be “at will”, doesn’t mean
  • remote work as a reasonable accomodations under FEHAAs remote work continues to reshape the workplace, both California employees and employers are grappling with a key question:When must an employer allow remote work as a reasonable accommodation to an employee’s disability or serious medical condition under California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA)?
    FEHA & Reasonable Accommodation Basics
    FEHA requires California employers with five or more employees to

    workpalce discrimination case in CaliforniaWinning any civil case, including an employment discrimination case, requires proving (1) liability and (2) damages (past and future wage loss, emotional distress, in some cases punitive damages). Because liability in many, if not most, wrongful termination and discrimination cases is disputed by employers, a practical assessment of how likely you are to prove liability and damages is essential before

    In its decision in Bailey v San Francisco District Attorney’s Office, the California Supreme Court has recently affirmed that even a single incident of using “N” word by a coworker in reference to a black employee can be a sufficient basis for making an unlawful harassment and hostile work environment. The Court emphasized that the analysis of any racial harassment